Fictional demonstration data — concept review only · no real hospital, client, or patient data appears anywhere in this app

Powered by Harsight · Built for TORCH

HARSIGHT UNITE — the intelligence layer your CIN is missing.

TORCH built the network. UNITE makes it the best-informed network in rural America.

43

hospitals in the TORCH CIN — 32 of them Critical Access

90,000+

covered lives in value-based arrangements

0

member closures or forced affiliations since 2021

$0

new capital projects required to add the intelligence layer

Watch first

The partnership behind UNITE, in two minutes.

HARS Advisors runs the advisory and central-billing-office lane; Harsight Technologies builds the platform. This short film introduces both — press play and the frame expands, then settles back when you pause.

HARS HARS Advisors × Harsight Technologies

The TORCH story

You built something almost nobody else in America managed to build.

Thirty-five years of association work, five years of network operations, and a track record that rural health systems in other states do not have. Everything below is history, not proposal.

1991

TORCH is founded

The trade association for Texas rural and community hospitals — advocacy, education, shared services.

Jan 2021

The first major rural CIN in America

Nine hospitals launch a member-owned LLC, seeded by UnitedHealthcare. Rural hospitals contract together for the first time.

2021–2026

Growth to 43 hospitals

32 Critical Access hospitals, ~100 clinics, ~800 miles of Texas, ~800,000 rural Texans, 90,000+ covered lives.

The result

Zero member closures

No member closed or was forced into affiliation, while 26 rural hospitals closed elsewhere in the same window.

2024

The C3HIE partnership

TORCH partnered with the nonprofit HIE after the state's required Medicaid quality-data platform proved "prohibitively expensive" for small facilities.

Jun 2026

All UHC contracts terminated

After 550+ days of failed negotiation, the network walked. The next round of negotiations needs evidence.

Scroll the timeline sideways →


Block one

You already said no to the right thing.

The analytics platform required for Texas Medicaid quality incentives was found “prohibitively expensive.” Characterization of the TORCH board's finding, as described in the Ascendient guide to rural clinically integrated networks (March 2026).

That was the correct call. A rural network should not fund a big-vendor analytics platform as a capital project — not at a per-hospital price built for 400-bed urban systems, not with a two-year implementation, and not with a seat license for every finance analyst you do not have.

But saying no left a gap. The network's own Executive Director has described raw data as “not always helpful,” with robust analytics remaining the biggest unmet need. Data you cannot interpret is not leverage. It is storage.

What the network has

Contracts, covered lives, a governance structure, member trust, and a data-sharing partnership with C3HIE.

What the network lacks

A shared way to see how each member is actually performing against payers, against peers, and against the market — in numbers a CFO can take into a negotiation.

What Harsight is proposing

Not a CIN. TORCH owns the CIN. Harsight proposes to be the vendor that supplies its intelligence layer, using infrastructure already built, owned, and running for Texas rural hospitals.

Block two

The plumbing already exists.

This is not a platform to be built. These four capabilities run today inside Harsight's rural-hospital stack. UNITE points them at the network instead of one hospital at a time.

Signed hospital financials

Advisor-verified figures, not a data dump. Every number traceable to the source file and the human who signed it.

DIMT

Market rate intelligence

Public payer negotiated-rate files, normalized to comparable services so a rate can be read against its own region.

Market Lake

Payer accountability

Scorecards for days-to-pay, denial and overturn rates, plus underpayment evidence tied to the contract term it violates.

VERIFY

Isolation by architecture

Row-level separation per hospital. Peers only ever see aged aggregates — never another member's identified numbers.

Tenant isolation

Block three

How the exchange works.

Three steps. No new entity, no new reporting burden, and no hospital ever negotiating on another hospital's behalf.

STEP 01

Hospitals keep loading what they already produce

The same monthly financial and revenue-cycle files that already leave the business office. No new template, no new staff.

STEP 02

Harsight aggregates as a neutral third party

Statistics are published only when all three conditions hold:

  • Aged three months or more
  • Minimum of five contributing hospitals
  • No hospital more than 25% of any statistic
STEP 03

The committee sees the network; each member sees itself

TORCH committees get network-level intelligence. Each hospital gets its own position and its own evidence — and every hospital negotiates on its own.

Deliberately boring: Harsight never negotiates for anyone, never brokers a rate, and never shows one member another member's identified data. The aggregation rules above are the product, not a disclaimer.

Who is behind this

Two partners, one offer.

Two screens make the case better than any deck.

A committee view for TORCH, and the member view a single CFO would open. Both built from fictional data for this review.